By |

I’ve been writing a series of essays for InterludeHK on pianists and their composers. Some are obvious choices – Gould, Schiff and Hewitt for Bach, for example. The selections are neither comprehensive nor definitive, and are by their very nature subjective – because they are selected by me. These articles are simply intended to offer readers some listening suggestions or a pointer to explore pianists and/or recordings with which they may not be familiar.

I tend not to read comments on my published essays these days, but I was amused – though not surprised – by some of the responses to my Pianists and their Composers articles. It is inevitable that such compilations will omit your favourite pianist for Bach, Beethoven, Schubert et al, and your choices will not necessarily align with mine.

“Wot, no XX, XX or XXX?” declared a ruffled reader on Twitter in response to my article on the music of Chopin. “How could you omit so-and-so?” demanded another on reading the article on Beethoven’s piano sonatas.

These responses demonstrate several important truths. First, that fans of classical music in general, and specific composers and artists in particular, care very deeply and are very attached to their favourite artists; secondly, that taste is a very personal, “me” thing.

Our musical taste is shaped from an early age, influenced initially by our parents’ listening habits, later by teachers, peers, friends, study, growing maturity, curiosity…. Our taste evolves and changes due to our experience of music, life experience, and a whole host of other factors – from mixtapes/playlists shared between friends at college to our first proper rock or classical concert or grand opera. Today the availability of a seemingly infinite amount of music of all genres means one’s taste and musical curiosity knows no bounds, if one allows it to graze freerange, uninhibited and with an open mind. Your taste won’t align with mine – and that’s fine. How dull life would be if we all liked the same thing!

But a word of caution: the quickest way to alienate me, or indeed anyone else who enjoys listening to music, is to tell them that their taste is “wrong”, or “bad”. Most of us don’t like music because we are told we should like it; nor do we stop liking it because we told shouldn’t like it!

Shameless begging bit:

This site is free to access and ad-free, and takes many hours to research, write, and maintain. If you find joy and value in what I do, please consider making a donation to support the continuance of this site

By |

I believe that our personal musical tastes should not influence the way we teach, and that we should try not to impose our preferences or prejudices on our students. Our role as teachers should be encourage students to explore as wide a range of music as possible – whether it is purely ‘classical’ music (in fact, a very broad term which encompasses music from the Renaissance to the present day) or a mixture of classical music, jazz, world or pop. This is not to say that I do not enthuse to my students about the kind of music which interests and excites me, and the “what is your favourite composer/piece of music?” conversation takes place regularly in my piano studio. But I wouldn’t dream of dismissing a piece of music a student had, for example, discovered and learnt by themselves just because I didn’t like it or thought it was “bad” music.

As a teacher, it is very interesting to find out what kind of repertoire makes students tick and what music appeals to specific students. For example, I find that boys tend to prefer lively, rhythmic, jazzy music. One of my teenage boy students has developed a real fondness for the music of Kabalevsky, while another, the older brother of this student in fact, is showing remarkable sensitivity towards a piece by Chopin which he is learning for Grade 6 (and I admit I was surprised when he selected this piece to learn). Other students like music with clear melodic lines and opportunities for expressive playing. I encourage my students to develop their musical taste by exploring a variety of repertoire and suggesting music for them to listen to as well (easy to do since many of them like to use YouTube or music streaming services), but I also urge them to learn music which is outside their normal comfort zone to enable them to explore different technical and musical challenges. Of course, if they really dislike a piece there is no point in continuing with it as there is no pleasure or usefulness to be gained from playing music you don’t enjoy.

Interpretation is a far more complex area, and more advanced/mature students and adults often have firm ideas about interpretation, either based on their own musical experience or their listening, knowledge and appreciation of music. Sadly, I have come across teachers who try to impose their own interpretation on students, sometimes to the extant that they seem to want the student to sound like they do: in such instances, this, to me, seems to be nothing more than an exercise in self-aggrandisement. It serves no real pedagogical purpose, nor does it allow the student to develop their own musical voice. (As the pianist Stephen Hough said in one of his blog posts, he would be worried if he listened in on a class of students at a conservatoire to discover that they all sounded identical to their teacher.)

The majority of my students are now intermediate and early advanced level players who are beginning to be able to make their own judgements about interpretation in their pieces based on their ongoing musical development and knowledge. In this case, I feel my role is to guide them into making decisions about interpretation which are stylistically in keeping with the genre and period of the music, faithful to the score, and tasteful. However, I would not dismiss a more romantic reading of the music of Bach or Scarlatti, for example, provided the interpretation offered is both consistent and convincing.

I am fortunate to be working with a teacher who does not impose his interpretation on me, but who sets the bar for me to explain and justify every interpretative decision I make in the music. Nearly all of this is based on detailed examination of the score, rather than preconceived ideas about how the music should sound or any attempt to imitate great/famous performers (which could lead to an insincere and inauthentic version). He allows the music making to be my business and encourages me to take ownership of the music and make it mine (more on taking ownership here). Thus, I feel I am offering a reading which is both personal and also faithful to the score.

Fundamentally, our teaching should be about imparting our musical values rather than our preferences, and encouraging our students to be curious, open-minded and non-judgmental. In addition to offering them a wide variety of repertoire, we should also be encouraging “listening around” the music they are studying to familiarise themselves with, for example, the very distinct soundworld of Chopin, as well as what I call “lateral listening” – a case of “if you like this, why not try?”, which I use a lot with students who enjoy the music of Ludovico Einaudi (I encourage them to sample the minimalist music of Philip Glass and Michael Nyman). Thus students can develop their own individual tastes and opinions about the music they are playing and enjoying.