Guest review by Anthony Hardwicke

The early afternoon concert was all about the stylish French pianist, Bertrand Chamayou. He started off by metaphorically holding the audience’s hand as he guided us through Ligeti’s early masterpiece Musica Ricercata. Chamayou’s versatile technique was deployed to lovingly characterise each of the 11 short movements, ending in a dazzling 12-tone fugue with immaculate legato fingerwork. Chamayou was every bit the pianist as a servant to the music.

Leif Ove Andsnes then joined Chamayou for some sumptuous, sensitive, carefully thought-through Schubert for four hands. The Allegro in A minor D.947 is one of the lesser known of the numerous masterpieces that Schubert wrote in the last year of his life, 1828. It’s of ‘heavenly length’, and Andsnes (playing secondo) affectionately controlled the huge sonata form structure while Chamayou’s light, ethereal running quavers moved the music forward. It is not often we get the chance to hear piano duet playing in concerts, let alone of such amazing quality and it was lovely to see the obvious mutual respect that Andsnes and Chamayou had for each other.
The concert ended with the Israeli-German clarinetist Sharon Kam and Julia Hagen (cello) joining Chamayou for Brahms’ Op.114 Clarinet Trio. I’m sure Kam has lived and breathed this piece her whole life. She had her eyes closed and there was so much bodily movement, it was almost like she was dancing the piece, using her clarinet almost as a conductor’s baton! The result of all this bodily movement was to give shape to each one of Brahms’ long phrases. Hagen and Chamayou sensibly made space for Kam’s soft, lush low register. Kam led the intensely private second movement with her sultry, smoky sound. All in all, a very satisfying performance which made an elusive piece of late Brahms easy to appreciate.
 
How many pianists could play three such huge and diverse pieces, consecutively and perfectly: a challenging Ligeti solo masterpiece, the primo part of a neglected Schubert piano duet and then a full-scale four-movement Brahms chamber work? Chamayou is the complete package.

Photo credit: Liv Øvland

Review by Anthony Hardwicke

The first concert of day two of the Rosendal Chamber Music Festival took place at 11am in Kvinnherad church. The sun was shining and the panoramic view of Hardangerfjord and the surrounding mountains was amazing. So too the music.

Kvinnherad Church

Julia Hagen played Brahms’ E minor Cello Sonata Op.38, with Roland Pontinen on piano. Hagen’s sound is warm, genteel and poetic. She managed an unbroken mood line for the whole of the first movement and Pontinen supported her as the intensity ebbed and flowed. He chose an ambitious tempo for the last movement (Brahms’ fugue-like hommage to J S Bach) but then *ping* – Hagen’s A string broke! She wasn’t fazed, quickly replaced the string and they started the movement again. A shade slower this time.

Off went Hagen and Pontinen and on came the dream team of James Ehnes (violin) Sheku Kanneh-Mason (cello) and Yoel-Eum Son (piano) to play Brahms’ Op.87 – his second piano trio in C major. And boy did they play it! It was the best performance in the festival so far. Ehnes was the sensible grown-up of the group. Kanneh-Mason (who had performed the same trio recently in Oxford with his siblings Braimah and Isata) seemed nervous for the first minute or two, but quickly got into the zone. The outer movements were wonderfully fleet and joyful with big colours and wild contrasts. Son’s ravishing solo piano phrases lit up the second movement. The third movement scherzo was lightening fast and tighter than Count Basie’s rhythm section! The three musicians could be seen enjoying and appreciating each other’s playing more and more as they progressed. It was a very special performance. Five stars! 

View the full festival programme here

Review of Concert 1


Anthony Hardwicke is an Islington-based amateur pianist. He played Mozart and Scriabin for his LRSM diploma and attends Martino Tirimo’s class at Morley College. He also works part time as a chemistry teacher at Bradfield College.

(Images from Rosendal Chamber Music Festival)

Anthony Hardwicke is attending the Rosendal Chamber Music Festival and has kindly offered to submit a series of reviews

Rosendal Chamber Music Festival- Day 1

Imagine a pretty Norwegian village in the middle of nowhere, surrounded by mountains and fjords. Add four of the most interesting and exciting pianists in the world; Leif Ove Andsnes, Yoel-Eum Son, Bertrand Chamayou and Roland Pontinen. Give them some first-class string players – Julia Hagen, Tabea Zimmerman and Sheku Kanneh-Mason to play with – along with many other fabulous musicians, such as superstar tenor Matthias Goerne, and you get this year’s Rosendal Chamber Music Festival. There are 11 mouth-watering concerts over four days and the focus is on Brahms and Ligeti.

The first concert opened with Brahms’ Violin Sonata Op.78, No. 1, played by James Ehnes and Yeol-Eum Son. Any preconceptions about Brahms’ chamber music being dense and stodgy, were brushed aside by Son’s exquisitely graceful piano playing. With impossibly smooth scales, sparing pedal and tonnes of detail, she gave Ehnes the space to use the full dynamic range of his Stradivarius, down to a whisper in the second movement coda. Their light, coy, bouyant approach to Brahms was refreshing and persuasive.

Ligeti’s outrageous ‘Mysteries of the Macabre’, arranged for trumpet (Hakan Hardenburger) and piano (Roland Pontinen) provided a complete contrast. Pontinen had a referee’s whistle attached to his right wrist, which he made good use of when acknowledging the audience’s applause, as well as during the third song.

To finish, Leif Ove Andsnes and the Dover Quartet played Brahms’ mighty F minor Piano Quartet Op.34. It felt like a gala concert, having five completely new performers on stage after the interval. Special mention to Camden Shaw, the Dover cellist, who barely looked at the score, so intense was his eye contact with the other players. You could tell the Dovers were listening to each other intensely too in the strings-only recitative section at the end of the first movement. Andsnes played solidly, but I would have liked him to have taken more risks. As the Artistic Director of the whole festival, Andsnes deserves huge credit for gathering such a dream team of chamber musicians.

Watch this space for reviews of the other concerts…


Anthony Hardwicke is an Islington-based amateur pianist. He played Mozart and Scriabin for his LRSM diploma and attends Martino Tirimo’s class at Morley College. He also works part time as a chemistry teacher at Bradfield College.

(Images from Rosendal Chamber Music Festival)

In his latest album, American pianist James Iman places Debussy’s everygreen Images alongside works by Jenny Beck and Donald Martino

IMAN: ALBUM II James W. Iman, piano (Divine Art Recordings)

This second album from American pianist James Iman places Debussy’s ‘Images’ alongside works by Donald Martino (1931-2005) and contemporary composer Jenny Beck (b.1985), whose work ‘Stand Still Here’ receives its premiere recording on this disc.

A specialist in music written since 1900 – with an emphasis on music written since 1945 – James Iman’s repertoire spans many stylistic developments since Debussy. He is particular in his study and research of the music he performs and records to enable him to find fresh interpretations and approaches to the familiar, as well as presenting the new and more leftfield corners of the repertoire to listeners. When I reviewed his debut album, I was impressed by his willingness to rise to the challenge of this music and meet it head on with conviction and musicality, alert to its myriad details and quirks. He is perhaps most at home in the contemporary and more unusual, yet on this second album, he displays a remarkable appreciation of Debussy’s music which I really enjoyed, allowing me to hear these well-known pieces afresh.

James Iman has, by his own admission, taken a very different approach to Debussy, one which some may find controversial. I asked James to explain how he arrived at his interpretation of the works by Debussy on this disc:

There are a few factors that went into my conception of these pieces. The first was a general frustration with recordings, and the homogeneity of most performances. This, of course, isn’t a new phenomenon, nor one specific to Debussy but, for whatever reason, it bothers me more in his music. While first digging into these pieces, my approach was probably similar to most pianists; you digest the text, and find the bits you think are interesting, and come up with an interpretation that highlights them. At first, my goal wasn’t to present a radical departure from typical interpretations, but the further into Debussy I dug, the more it seemed necessary. Improvisation was almost a character trait of Debussy. He would improvise at the piano before class, and for hours at parties. Moreover, Debussy’s performances of his own pieces were said to sound improvised. Likewise, one of the things that Debussy expressed, repeatedly, was his desire to compose music that sounded as though it was being improvised. This was, of course, mainly an aesthetic concern – Debussy was looking to overcome the strictures of convention, and was (primarily, perhaps) referring to the perceived structure of his works and not necessarily the nature of the performance.

Two things crystalized all of these ideas for me. First was my discovery of the recordings by Paul Crossley. I don’t know how well-known his performances are, but they were new to me, and a revelation. Absolutely every measure is inflected! Every single note feels important. Somehow, miraculously, he avoids making the music sound manic. Second was discovering Debussy’s own recordings of his works. It’s really difficult to describe just how radical Debussy’s playing is! Notes of the same duration are two distinct speeds within the same phrase and occasionally within the same bar. He pushes and pulls tempo without warning and to degrees that would be regarded as well-outside what we might consider “good taste.”

All of these things together made it clear to me that, not only could I approach these pieces differently, but that I should. We’re a history-obsessed culture – we’re excessively concerned with the fidelity of a text (the “letter”), whether it’s law or religion or music. I wanted to concern myself more with the spirit of the text – get the notes, of course, but try to capture what Debussy has clearly shown was his intention.”

Iman’s ‘Images’ are bold and direct, brightly-lit and vividly hued: no impressionistic veils of sound here nor excessive use of the pedal. Mouvement thrums and pulsates; Hommage à Rameau has a stately grandeur that feels at once ancient and modern; the darting fish of Poissons d’or are not shy goldfish but bold, muscular Koi carp. Debussy’s vibrant musical language comes to the fore in Iman’s playing with an emphasis on the more piquant or crunchy harmonies and timbres, rather than melody. Attention to these details perhaps comes from Iman’s experience with more contemporary repertoire: there are passages where Debussy sounds ultra-modern when Iman highlights interior or bass details which are sometimes lost or underplayed in other performances of this music. Given Debussy’s dislike of the term “impressionist” in relation to his music, I suspect he may have enjoyed Iman’s interpretation.

After the myriad colours, harmonies and rhythms of Debussy, Jenny Beck’s ‘Stand Still Here’ – a suite of five terse miniatures each no longer than four minutes at most – provides an extraordinary contrast. These introspective, intimate pieces have a remarkable emotional presence, yet expressed so sparely, almost minimalistic. Yet, like Debussy, Beck exploits the timbres and sonorities of the piano to create a hypnotic intensity. Of this work, Iman says, “I have played Stand Still Here more times than any other work in my repertoire”. Through a deep familiarity, and affection, for this work, Iman is able to achieve a wonderful sense of spontaneity and improvisation: notes linger, vibrate, shimmer and fade. It’s a deeply absorbing interlude on this fascinating disc.

The final works are by Donald Martino. He studied with Roger Sessions and Milton Babbitt, two of America’s foremost twelve-tone composers, but did not adopt the practice himself until he studied in Italy with Luigi Dallapiccola (though he never described himself as a “twelve-tone composer”). From Dallapiccola, Martino took a more lyrical approach to composing twelve-tone music, which culminates in his Fantasies and Impromptus. Like Debussy and Jenny Beck, Donald Martino enjoyed the myriad sonorities the piano offers. Iman gives a masterful performance of this collection of pieces which combine virtuosity and expression, improvisation and structure, making them the perfect complement to Debussy.

IMAN II is available on the Divine Art label and via streaming platforms


This review first appeared on my sister site ArtMuseLondon.com